Dr. Ondine Berland

Ondine
Berland

I am an applied microeconomist. I study why households eat what they eat, and the implications for carbon emissions and inequality.

Postdoctoral Fellow in Environmental Economics

London School of Economics

Affiliated with the Grantham Research Institute

Fields: Public Economics, Environmental Econonmics, Food Studies

Research

Job Market Paper

Carbon Taxation of Food: Consumer Responses and Distributional Effects

Abstract

Food consumption accounts for a quarter of household carbon footprints, comparable in magnitude to housing and transport. Food products vary widely in carbon intensity, creating scope to reduce emissions by changing the composition of food baskets. A carbon tax could encourage such changes, but its effectiveness and incidence depend on what households purchase before the tax and how they adjust their purchases in response to higher prices. This paper combines granular household purchase data with product-level emission intensities to study these questions. The distribution of carbon footprints exhibits no clear income gradient (correlation $=-0.03$), and high-emitting products, particularly red meat, are purchased by most households. Reduced-form estimates show that higher red-meat prices mainly reduce purchased quantities, with no detectable change in the probability of purchase. Estimates from a structural demand system indicate that red meat is highly price-elastic, and that households substitute toward less carbon-intensive categories when its price increases. Simulations show that a carbon tax of 44.6euro per ton of CO2e reduces food emissions by 7.9%. Uniform redistribution of tax revenues brings average net tax payments close to zero in every income decile.

Read Job Market Paper (PDF) ↗

Working Papers

The Gender Gap in Carbon Footprints: Determinants and Implications

Abstract

Understanding individual carbon footprints is central to designing equitable climate policy, yet little is known about gender differences in emissions. We document that women emit 26 percent less than men from food and transport, using detailed consumption data from France. After accounting for socioeconomic characteristics and differences in the scale of consumption, an 8 percent gap remains. Intra-household dynamics influence the magnitude of the gap, especially for transport. Across house- hold arrangements, residual differences are driven by the disproportionate contribution of red meat and car—but not plane—in men’s carbon footprints, two goods that tend to be associated with masculine norms. Our results suggest that climate policies may affect men and women differently.

More Than Food: The Effects of Food Intervention on Students Food Choices and Health Outcomes

with Bénédicte Apouey, Simon Briole, and Damien Mayaux

Abstract

Higher education students often face significant challenges in maintaining adequate and healthy food consumption due to financial constraints. We evaluate a food-assistance intervention through a randomized controlled trial involving 190 higher education students in the Paris area. Students assigned to treatment received 125euros per month for four months through a mobile payment application accepted in participating food retailers. The program also included workshops and social activities led by a local NGO. After five months of the program, treated students reported lower food insecurity (−11.3 percentage points, (p<0.10)) and more frequent organic food consumption (+39.4 percentage points for consumption at least once a week, p<0.001). We also find better general health (+0.41 points on a 0-10 scale, p<0.1), reduced depression (−0.20 SE, p<0.05), and higher life satisfaction (+0.64 points on a 0-10 scale, p<0.05). Effects are more pronounced among women. Our findings suggest that food assistance for students can yield benefits that extend well beyond dietary outcomes, improving mental health and well-being.

How Do Households Adjust Food Purchases to Fuel Price Shocks?

with Fabrice Etilé
July 2022

Abstract

Shocks in energy prices impact households' disposable income and welfare, with consequences for the acceptance of environmental policies. We examine how households adjust food consumption to such shocks by estimating the effects of fuel prices on food purchasing patterns in France. Using homescan data, we find an elasticity of total food expenditure of approximately -0.3, mainly through reductions in the unit value of products. We highlight that households adjust more on unit value for fresh fruits and vegetables, and more on volumes for animal proteins and alcohol. They adjust their purchase patterns by restricting the frequency of shopping trips, visiting hard discount stores, substituting among, and buying in bulk. Low-income households do not adjust significantly to fuel price shocks, likely because they have already largely exploited these adjustment margins. Thus, they are directly affected by any abrupt increase in fuel prices.

Work in Progress

Junk Food, Leisure, and Income Inequalities — with Eve Colson-Sihra and Emmanuel Paroissien

Food Transitions in India and Associated Environmental Impacts — with Eve Colson-Sihra

Publications

Unequal Progress and Barriers for Women in Economics

with Oliver Harman, Ninon Moreau-Kastler
Reviews of Economic Literature, 2026
Stanford University Press

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on gender inequalities in the academic field of economics, highlighting both the unequal progress women have experienced and the persistent barriers they continue to face. Our analysis of recent literature and available data highlights that the reduction in women's absence in the field has been heterogeneous. While women now constitute 26% of published economists, their presence sharply declines at higher ranks, with only 5% representation among economists in the top percentile of research influence. Notably, recent progress has paradoxically concentrated at this highest level, indicating shifting institutional norms and evolving perceptions about women's contributions. We further explore how understanding women's behaviours and career choices, gender biases in evaluation, and workplace environments contribute to women's underrepresentation in the field. Our discussion extends to the labour market for economists, drawing parallels with broader labour trends, and examining how gender-biased treatment and hiring processes impact women's advancement. Finally, we turn to policy interventions, which are key in promoting gender balance, focusing on networks, mentorship, role models, and representation.

Featured In:

Teaching

GY426 — Environmental and Resource Economics

London School of Economics • Graduate level

2025–present • Lecturer

GY473 — Economic Development and the Environment

London School of Economics • Graduate level

2025–present • Lecturer

GY222 — Applied Environmental Economics

London School of Economics • Undergraduate level

2025–present • Lecturer

Sustainable Food Systems

University of Paris-Saclay • M.Sc. program

2024 • Guest Lecturer

Introduction to Environmental Economics

Sciences Po • Master's (Fall), led by Stephen Smith (UCL)

2020–2023 • Teaching Assistant

Dynamic Macroeconomics

ENS Paris-Saclay • 3rd year Bachelor (Fall), led by Hubert Kempf

2020–2021 • TA

Growth Models

ENS Paris-Saclay • 3rd year Bachelor (Spring), led by Hubert Kempf

2020–2021 • TA

Education & Affiliations

Education

Ph.D. in Economics

Paris-Saclay University

2024

M.Sc. in Economics

Paris School of Economics

2020

B.Sc. in Economics

École Normale Supérieure

2018

Current Affiliations

London School of Economics

Fellow in Environmental Economics

Grantham Research Institute

Affiliate Researcher

Let's connect about research.

If you'd like to talk about research, feel free to reach out.